Safe routes in communities grants: capital grant application assessment criteria and weighting
Explains the criteria and weighting used to award funding for safe routes in communities.
This file may not be fully accessible.
Safe Routes in Communities
Criteria |
Weighting (W) |
Strategic case: does the scheme demonstrate a sound case for change? Does the scheme fit with policies and plans? |
5 |
Strategic case: does it meet the relevant capital grant objectives in the guidance? |
10 |
Transport case: does the scheme maximise contribution to the Wales Transport Strategy ambitions, which are linked to the well-being goals? |
10 |
Transport case: does the scheme offer value for money? |
5 |
Management case: is the scheme deliverable and have any milestones been explained? Have the delivery risks been identified and mitigated? |
5 |
Financial case: what is the total scheme cost to SRiC? Scoring: <£0.1m = 5, £0.1m-£0.24m = 4, £0.25m-£0.49m = 3, £0.5m-£0.99m = 2, £1m-£1.49m = 1, £1.5m and over = 0 |
4 |
Match funding: is match funding available? Scoring: 0% = 0, 1%-9% = 1; 10%-19% = 2; 20%-29% = 3; 30%-39% = 4 etc |
4 |
Commercial case: how will the scheme be procured? Is it viable? Does the contract length fit with the grant terms and conditions? |
3 |
Monitoring and evaluation: does the proposal include plan for monitoring and evaluation? |
3 |
Promotion: does the proposal include plans to encourage people to travel more sustainably? |
3 |
Scoring
5 = Outstanding
4 = Very Good
3 = Good
2 = Adequate
1 = Poor
0 = None or No Evidence
Calculation
The weighting is multiplied by the scoring for the assessment values, which are all added together to give the final value.